Ensource Investments LLC v. Tatham, 3:17-cv-00079-H-LL. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190221b99
Visitors: 3
Filed: Feb. 20, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 20, 2019
Summary: ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT MARILYN L. HUFF , District Judge . On February 15, 2019, Plaintiff Ensource Investments, LLC and Defendants Thomas P. Tatham ("Tatham") and PDP Management Group, LLC ("PDP") (collectively, "Defendants") filed a joint motion for extension of time to file an answer. (Doc. No. 112.) As set forth in the May 1, 2018 order granting in part and denying in part motion to withdraw, PDP must appear in court through counsel. (Doc. No. 63
Summary: ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT MARILYN L. HUFF , District Judge . On February 15, 2019, Plaintiff Ensource Investments, LLC and Defendants Thomas P. Tatham ("Tatham") and PDP Management Group, LLC ("PDP") (collectively, "Defendants") filed a joint motion for extension of time to file an answer. (Doc. No. 112.) As set forth in the May 1, 2018 order granting in part and denying in part motion to withdraw, PDP must appear in court through counsel. (Doc. No. 63...
More
ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
MARILYN L. HUFF, District Judge.
On February 15, 2019, Plaintiff Ensource Investments, LLC and Defendants Thomas P. Tatham ("Tatham") and PDP Management Group, LLC ("PDP") (collectively, "Defendants") filed a joint motion for extension of time to file an answer. (Doc. No. 112.) As set forth in the May 1, 2018 order granting in part and denying in part motion to withdraw, PDP must appear in court through counsel. (Doc. No. 63.) Although Tatham can sign on his own behalf, as an individual pro se defendant, he cannot sign on behalf of PDP. The Court finds, however, that an extension of time to file an answer is appropriate under the circumstances of this case given that the parties are engaged in settlement negotiations. Accordingly, the Court orders that Defendants' answer to the first amended complaint is due on or before March 1, 2019.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
