Johnson v. Marinello, 18-cv-04707-VC. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190228917
Visitors: 19
Filed: Feb. 27, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 27, 2019
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL VINCE CHHABRIA , District Judge . The Court has been advised by the Notice of Settlement filed on February 25, 2019 that the parties have resolved this case. (Re: Dkt. No. 26). Therefore, it is ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. All deadlines and hearings in the case are vacated. Any pending motions are moot. The parties retain the right to reopen this action within 60 days of this Order if the settlement is not consummated. If a request to reinstate
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL VINCE CHHABRIA , District Judge . The Court has been advised by the Notice of Settlement filed on February 25, 2019 that the parties have resolved this case. (Re: Dkt. No. 26). Therefore, it is ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. All deadlines and hearings in the case are vacated. Any pending motions are moot. The parties retain the right to reopen this action within 60 days of this Order if the settlement is not consummated. If a request to reinstate t..
More
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge.
The Court has been advised by the Notice of Settlement filed on February 25, 2019 that the parties have resolved this case. (Re: Dkt. No. 26). Therefore, it is ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. All deadlines and hearings in the case are vacated. Any pending motions are moot.
The parties retain the right to reopen this action within 60 days of this Order if the settlement is not consummated. If a request to reinstate the case is not filed and served on opposing counsel within 60 days, the dismissal will be with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
