U.S. v. Ou-Young, 17-cr-00263-MMC-1. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190301b47
Visitors: 28
Filed: Feb. 28, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 28, 2019
Summary: ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Re: Dkt. No. 88 MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . The Court is in receipt of a document titled "Motion for Preliminary Injunction," filed pro se on February 27, 2019, by defendant Kuang Bao Ou-Young ("Ou-Young"). For the reasons set forth in the Court's Order of February 22, 2019, denying Ou-Young's "Third Motion to Dismiss, Motion to Disqualify U.S. Attorney David L. Anderson and His Office, Third Motion to Disqualify Defen
Summary: ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Re: Dkt. No. 88 MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . The Court is in receipt of a document titled "Motion for Preliminary Injunction," filed pro se on February 27, 2019, by defendant Kuang Bao Ou-Young ("Ou-Young"). For the reasons set forth in the Court's Order of February 22, 2019, denying Ou-Young's "Third Motion to Dismiss, Motion to Disqualify U.S. Attorney David L. Anderson and His Office, Third Motion to Disqualify Defens..
More
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
Re: Dkt. No. 88
MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge.
The Court is in receipt of a document titled "Motion for Preliminary Injunction," filed pro se on February 27, 2019, by defendant Kuang Bao Ou-Young ("Ou-Young").
For the reasons set forth in the Court's Order of February 22, 2019, denying Ou-Young's "Third Motion to Dismiss, Motion to Disqualify U.S. Attorney David L. Anderson and His Office, Third Motion to Disqualify Defense Counsel, Third Motion to Disqualify Judges, and Motion to Return Property," the instant motion is hereby DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle