Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Spector v. Bergman, 17-cv-05459-VKD. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20190301b76 Visitors: 6
Filed: Feb. 28, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 28, 2019
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE JOINT PRETRIAL STATEMENT VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI , Magistrate Judge . The parties advised the Court that they settled their dispute on January 28, 2019. Dkt. No. 74. The parties represented to the Court that they would file a stipulated dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 by February 27, 2019. Dkt. No. 78. All pretrial deadlines and trial dates remain on calendar unless and until a stipulated dismissal is filed. Dkt. No. 76. The parties' joint pretr
More

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE JOINT PRETRIAL STATEMENT

The parties advised the Court that they settled their dispute on January 28, 2019. Dkt. No. 74. The parties represented to the Court that they would file a stipulated dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 by February 27, 2019. Dkt. No. 78.

All pretrial deadlines and trial dates remain on calendar unless and until a stipulated dismissal is filed. Dkt. No. 76. The parties' joint pretrial statement was due on February 27, 2019, the pretrial conference is set for March 6, 2019, and trial is scheduled for March 13-15, 2019. Dkt. No. 63.

The parties failed to file either a stipulated dismissal or their joint pretrial statement by February 27, 2019.

Accordingly, the parties are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the Court should not impose monetary or other sanctions against them for failure to file the joint pretrial statement as the Court ordered. A written response to this Order must be filed by March 1, 2019. The Court will hold a hearing on this Order to Show Cause on March 5, 2019, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 2, Fifth Floor, 280 South First Street, San Jose, California 95008.

In addition, the Court reminds the parties that, in the event they fail to proceed with trial as scheduled, Civil Local Rule 40-1 provides for the assessment of jury costs and the imposition of appropriate sanctions against them.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer