Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Paed v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 19-cv-00773-YGR. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20190312858 Visitors: 11
Filed: Mar. 11, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 11, 2019
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Re: Dkt. No. 6 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS , District Judge . Plaintiff Cecille Q. Paed is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to why the above-captioned matter should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute in light of plaintiff's failure to file an opposition or a notice that plaintiff does not oppose dismissal by March 6, 2019 as required by Civil Local Rule 7-3, and as ordered by the Court on February 25, 2019. ( See Dkt. Nos. 6, 11.) A hearing on this Order to Show Ca
More

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Re: Dkt. No. 6

Plaintiff Cecille Q. Paed is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to why the above-captioned matter should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute in light of plaintiff's failure to file an opposition or a notice that plaintiff does not oppose dismissal by March 6, 2019 as required by Civil Local Rule 7-3, and as ordered by the Court on February 25, 2019. (See Dkt. Nos. 6, 11.)

A hearing on this Order to Show Cause will be held on Friday, March 29, 2019, on the Court's 9:01 a.m. calendar, in the Federal Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California, in Courtroom 1. By no later than Friday, March 22, 2019, plaintiff must file an opposition to defendant's motion to dismiss (or a statement of non-opposition). Failure to file a response by that date will result in dismissal of this lawsuit for failure to prosecute. Any reply to plaintiff's response must be filed not more than seven (7) days thereafter.

The Court further VACATES the hearing currently set for April 2, 2019. After briefing is complete, the Court may reset a hearing if necessary.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer