Elawyers Elawyers

Stambanis v. TBWA Worldwide, Inc., 3:19-CV-00821-TSH. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20190314935 Visitors: 10
Filed: Mar. 13, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 13, 2019
Summary: SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT THOMAS S. HIXSON , District Judge . Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12, and Local Rule 6-1(a), Plaintiff REBECCA STAMBANIS ("Plaintiff") and Defendant TBWA WORLDWIDE, INC. dba TBWA/MEDIA ARTS LAB ("Defendant"), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate to extend the time within which Defendant has to answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint. Plaintiff
More

SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12, and Local Rule 6-1(a), Plaintiff REBECCA STAMBANIS ("Plaintiff") and Defendant TBWA WORLDWIDE, INC. dba TBWA/MEDIA ARTS LAB ("Defendant"), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate to extend the time within which Defendant has to answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint.

Plaintiff filed the Complaint in this action on or around September 10, 2018. Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint on or around December 6, 2018. Defendant was served with the Complaint, First Amended Complaint, Summons, and other case-initiating documents on or around January 15, 2019. Defendant timely filed a Notice of Removal with this Court on February 14, 2019. Thus, the deadline for Defendant's response to the First Amended Complaint is February 21, 2019.

At Defendant's request, Plaintiff agreed to an extension of time for Defendant to respond to the First Amended Complaint to March 15, 2019. Defendant has requested a further extension of time to respond to the First Amended Complaint, and Plaintiff has agreed to a further extension of time for Defendant to respond to the First Amended Complaint to March 29, 2019.

The parties also agree that pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), this stipulation is respectfully submitted to the Court for approval without the necessity of a hearing.

FILER ATTESTATION

Pursuant to L.R. 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I, Emily Schroeder, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory, Craig A. Pinedo. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed this 12th day of March, 2019 at Los Angeles, California.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer