Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Sabr v. Berryhill, 3:18-cv-06516-EDL. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20190315b36 Visitors: 7
Filed: Mar. 13, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 13, 2019
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS MODIFIED ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the undersigned attorneys, subject to the approval of the Court, Plaintiff's time to file his Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from March 13, 2019, until April 13, 2019. This is Plaintiff's first request for an extension of time to file his Motion for Summary Judgment. There is good cause for
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS MODIFIED

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the undersigned attorneys, subject to the approval of the Court, Plaintiff's time to file his Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from March 13, 2019, until April 13, 2019. This is Plaintiff's first request for an extension of time to file his Motion for Summary Judgment. There is good cause for this extension because counsel for Plaintiff has been unable to access the Administrative Transcript via the PACER system.

Plaintiff shall have an extension until April 13, 2019, to file his Motion for Summary Judgment. The parties further stipulate that all subsequent deadlines in the Court's Procedural Order for Social Security Review Actions shall be extended accordingly.

The parties stipulate in good faith with no intent to prolong proceedings unduly.

This is Plaintiff's first request for an extension of time to file his Motion for Summary Judgment.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer