Filed: Mar. 21, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 21, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . WHEREAS, per order of this Court, a Case Management Conference is currently scheduled to be held in the above-captioned cases on March 26, 2019, at 2:00 p.m. to consider how to proceed with the issue that has been remanded by the Ninth Circuit, namely, whether a nationwide injunction is appropriate in this case; and WHEREAS, the parties to these cases believe that they are close to
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . WHEREAS, per order of this Court, a Case Management Conference is currently scheduled to be held in the above-captioned cases on March 26, 2019, at 2:00 p.m. to consider how to proceed with the issue that has been remanded by the Ninth Circuit, namely, whether a nationwide injunction is appropriate in this case; and WHEREAS, the parties to these cases believe that they are close to ..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge.
WHEREAS, per order of this Court, a Case Management Conference is currently scheduled to be held in the above-captioned cases on March 26, 2019, at 2:00 p.m. to consider how to proceed with the issue that has been remanded by the Ninth Circuit, namely, whether a nationwide injunction is appropriate in this case; and
WHEREAS, the parties to these cases believe that they are close to a resolution of this matter without the need for further court intervention;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties through their respective attorneys of records that the Case Management Conference be rescheduled for April 30, 2019 at 2:00 p.m., if possible.
ORDER
The Case Management Conference currently set for March 26, 2019, is rescheduled for April 30, 2019 at 2:00 p.m. The parties shall file a Joint Case Management Statement on April 23, 2019 that outlines their proposed procedure(s) and the proposed timing thereof.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
ATTESTATION OF SIGNATURES
I, Danielle L. Goldstein, hereby attest, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5-1(i)(3) of the Northerns District of California that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each signatory hereto.
By: /s/ Danielle Goldstein
DANIELLE L. GOLDSTEIN
Deputy County Counsel
