Ramirez v. City of Capitola, 5:18-cv-04142-NC. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190401994
Visitors: 2
Filed: Mar. 29, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 29, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER [FRCP 41(a)(1)] NATHAN M. COUSINS , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATION by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-entitled action filed by Plaintiff OSCAR RAMIREZ, against Defendants CITY OF CAPITOLA, CAPITOLA POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER ZACK CURRIER, and all others is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Fed.Rule.Civ.Pro. 41(a)(1), with each party to bear their own costs and
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER [FRCP 41(a)(1)] NATHAN M. COUSINS , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATION by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-entitled action filed by Plaintiff OSCAR RAMIREZ, against Defendants CITY OF CAPITOLA, CAPITOLA POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER ZACK CURRIER, and all others is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Fed.Rule.Civ.Pro. 41(a)(1), with each party to bear their own costs and ..
More
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER [FRCP 41(a)(1)]
NATHAN M. COUSINS, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATION by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-entitled action filed by Plaintiff OSCAR RAMIREZ, against Defendants CITY OF CAPITOLA, CAPITOLA POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER ZACK CURRIER, and all others is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Fed.Rule.Civ.Pro. 41(a)(1), with each party to bear their own costs and attorney fees
ORDER
This Stipulation of Dismissal is hereby adopted by the Court and, as such, this matter is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
