Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Toy v. Honeywell International Inc., 19-cv-00325-HSG (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20190403d41
Filed: Apr. 02, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 02, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE Re: Dkt. Nos. 125, 121, 93 HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . Pending before the Court is Defendant Genuine Parts Company's motion to consolidate these three cases. The time for responses and replies has passed and none have been filed. 1 Because these three cases are identical—they each originated from the same complaint in state court, which was removed by three separate Defendants—the Court GRANTS the motion to consolidate. The cases capt
More

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE

Re: Dkt. Nos. 125, 121, 93

Pending before the Court is Defendant Genuine Parts Company's motion to consolidate these three cases. The time for responses and replies has passed and none have been filed.1 Because these three cases are identical—they each originated from the same complaint in state court, which was removed by three separate Defendants—the Court GRANTS the motion to consolidate.

The cases captioned Toy v. Honeywell International Inc., Case No. 19-326, and Toy v. Honeywell International Inc., Case No. 19-336, are hereby consolidated into the action captioned Toy v. Honeywell International Inc., Case No. 19-325. The earliest-filed civil action, Case No. 19-325, shall serve as the lead case. The clerk is directed to administratively close the later-filed civil actions, Case Nos. 19-326 and 19-336. All future filings shall be done in the lead case only and shall be captioned "In re Toy Asbestos Litigation."

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b).
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer