STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PAGE LIMITS FOR INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION ACTIONS TO THE IRICO DEFENDANTS' AMENDED MOTIONS TO DISMISS CLAIMS OF INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION (FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(1)) (ECF Nos. 5409, 5411)

JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.

Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs ("IPPs") and Defendants Irico Group Corporation and Irico Display Devices Co., Ltd. (together, the "Irico Defendants" or "Irico"), by and through the undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, on March 19, 2019, the Irico Defendants filed Irico Group Corporation's Amended Motion to Dismiss Claims of Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1)), ECF No. 5409, and Irico Display Devices Co., Ltd.'s Amended Motion to Dismiss Claims of Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1)), ECF No. 5411;

WHEREAS, pursuant to stipulation and order entered by the Court on January 30, 2019, IPPs' oppositions to Irico's amended motions to dismiss shall be due on or before April 12, 2019, ECF No. 5381;

WHEREAS, under Civil Local Rule 7-4(b), "[u]nless the Court expressly orders otherwise pursuant to a party's request made prior to the due date, briefs or memoranda filed with opposition papers may not exceed 25 pages of text";

WHEREAS, IPPs wish to file a single opposition brief not to exceed 40 pages of text;

WHEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for Plaintiffs and the Irico Defendants:

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.