ACL Netherlands B.V. v. For an order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. & 1782 to take Testimony for Use in Foreign Proceedings, 19-mc-80023-CRB. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190415880
Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 20, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 20, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING 28 U.S.C. 1782 REQUEST CHARLES R. BREYER , District Judge . Petitioners seek an order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782(a) to take the testimony via videolink of Christopher Egan for use in a trial in England. App. for Order (Dkt. 1) at 1, 3. 1 Egan initially objected to this request, Dkt. 6, but subsequently withdrew his objection. Dkt. 27. Because there is no dispute that an order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782 should issue, see Dkt. 1; Dkt. 27, the Court GRANTS Petitioners' re
Summary: ORDER GRANTING 28 U.S.C. 1782 REQUEST CHARLES R. BREYER , District Judge . Petitioners seek an order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782(a) to take the testimony via videolink of Christopher Egan for use in a trial in England. App. for Order (Dkt. 1) at 1, 3. 1 Egan initially objected to this request, Dkt. 6, but subsequently withdrew his objection. Dkt. 27. Because there is no dispute that an order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782 should issue, see Dkt. 1; Dkt. 27, the Court GRANTS Petitioners' req..
More
ORDER GRANTING 28 U.S.C. § 1782 REQUEST
CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge.
Petitioners seek an order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782(a) to take the testimony via videolink of Christopher Egan for use in a trial in England. App. for Order (Dkt. 1) at 1, 3.1 Egan initially objected to this request, Dkt. 6, but subsequently withdrew his objection. Dkt. 27. Because there is no dispute that an order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782 should issue, see Dkt. 1; Dkt. 27, the Court GRANTS Petitioners' request for leave, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782, to serve their proposed subpoena, attached to the Application for Order (Dkt. 1), on Christopher "Stouffer" Egan to compel his videolink testimony in the English Civil Case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Michael Lynch initially sought to intervene in this case, Dkt. 12, but has since withdrawn that motion because the English High Court ruled that it would permit Egan's video-link testimony. Lynch Withdrawal of Mot. to Intervene (Dkt. 17).
Source: Leagle
