Filed: Mar. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2019
Summary: Amended STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SHORTENING TIME FOR HEARING ON NON-PARTY CATHIE LESJAK'S MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA [Crim. L.R. 47-4, Civil L.R. 6-2] CHARLES R. BREYER , District Judge . Non-party Cathie Lesjak, Plaintiff United States of America, and Defendant Sushovan Hussain (collectively, the "Parties"), acting by and through their counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, on March 19, 2019, Defendant Sushovan Hussain ("Defendant") indicated he would serve a subpoena on
Summary: Amended STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SHORTENING TIME FOR HEARING ON NON-PARTY CATHIE LESJAK'S MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA [Crim. L.R. 47-4, Civil L.R. 6-2] CHARLES R. BREYER , District Judge . Non-party Cathie Lesjak, Plaintiff United States of America, and Defendant Sushovan Hussain (collectively, the "Parties"), acting by and through their counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, on March 19, 2019, Defendant Sushovan Hussain ("Defendant") indicated he would serve a subpoena on ..
More
Amended STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SHORTENING TIME FOR HEARING ON NON-PARTY CATHIE LESJAK'S MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA [Crim. L.R. 47-4, Civil L.R. 6-2]
CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge.
Non-party Cathie Lesjak, Plaintiff United States of America, and Defendant Sushovan Hussain (collectively, the "Parties"), acting by and through their counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, on March 19, 2019, Defendant Sushovan Hussain ("Defendant") indicated he would serve a subpoena on Cathie Lesjak requiring her testimony at the Sentencing Guideline Hearing set for April 8, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. in this Court; and, on March 21, 2019, Ms. Lesjak indicated she would accept service of such a subpoena even though she intended to move to quash it;
WHEREAS, Ms. Lesjak has notified the parties of her intent to move to quash the subpoena on March 21, 2019, and is filing said Motion to Quash on March 22, 2019 (ECF No. forthcoming);
WHEREAS, pursuant to Crim. L.R. 47-2. motions must be noticed for hearing not less than 14 days after service of the motion;
WHEREAS, pursuant to Crim. L.R. 47-2, the earliest day this Court could hear Ms. Lesjak's Motion to Quash would be April 5, only three days prior to the Sentencing Guideline Hearing at which Ms. Lesjak would be required to testify;
WHEREAS, for the reasons stated in Ms. Lesjak's Motion to Quash and accompanying Declaration of Steven M. Schatz, Ms. Lesjak and her attorney would not be available on April 5 for such a hearing on her Motion to Quash;
WHEREAS, Ms. Lesjak's counsel has conferred with counsel for Defendant and the Government and confirmed that they do not oppose hearing Ms. Lesjak's Motion to Quash on shortened time on March 27, 2019; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Lesjak's counsel, Defendant's counsel, and the Government's counsel have confirmed they are available for a hearing on the Motion to Quash on March 27, 2019:
NOW, THEREFORE, counsel for the United States, Mr. Hussain, and Ms. Lesjak hereby agree, subject to the Court's approval, that:
(1) The Court will hear Ms. Lesjak's Motion to Quash on March 27, 2019, at 1:30 pm. or as soon as possible thereafter.
(2) Oppositions, if any, to the Motion to Quash are due on or before March 25, 2019.
(3) Ms. Lesjak's reply, if any, in support of her Motion to Quash is due on or before March 26, 2019.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN, it is hereby ordered that:
1. The Court will hear Ms. Lesjak's Motion to Quash on April 13, 2019, at 1:30 pm. or as soon as possible thereafter.
2. Oppositions, if any, to the Motion to Quash are due on or before March 26, 2019.
3. Ms. Lesjak's reply, if any, in support of her Motion to Quash is due on or before March 27, 2019.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
