Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Hessefort v. Super Micro Computer, Inc., 3:18-cv-00838-JST. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20190416b38 Visitors: 5
Filed: Apr. 15, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 15, 2019
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [ PROPOSED ] ORDER RE FILING OF CONSOLIDATED MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO MOTIONS TO DISMISS JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . WHEREAS, on March 8, 2019, Defendants Super Micro Computer, Inc., Charles Liang, and Perry G. Hayes ("Super Micro Defendants") and Defendant Howard Hideshima ("Defendant Hideshima") separately filed motions to dismiss the First Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint for Violations of the Securities Laws filed by Lead Plaintiff New York Hotel
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE FILING OF CONSOLIDATED MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO MOTIONS TO DISMISS

WHEREAS, on March 8, 2019, Defendants Super Micro Computer, Inc., Charles Liang, and Perry G. Hayes ("Super Micro Defendants") and Defendant Howard Hideshima ("Defendant Hideshima") separately filed motions to dismiss the First Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint for Violations of the Securities Laws filed by Lead Plaintiff New York Hotel Trades Council & Hotel Association of New York City, Inc. Pension Fund ("Plaintiff") (ECF. Nos. 61-63);

WHEREAS, Plaintiff may file two separate memoranda, up to 25 pages each, in response to the motions to dismiss;

WHEREAS, Civil L.R. 7-4(b) states that "[u]nless the Court expressly orders otherwise pursuant to a party's request made prior to the due date, briefs or memoranda filed with opposition papers may not exceed 25 pages of text"; and

WHEREAS, Plaintiff seeks to file a single consolidated opposition memorandum, not exceeding 30 pages, exclusive of the caption page, tables of contents and authorities, in response to the motions to dismiss which Plaintiff believes will help to avoid duplication of argument that would otherwise occur with separate briefing and will be more efficient for the parties and the Court.

NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-12, the undersigned parties, by and through their counsel of record, stipulate as follows:

1. Plaintiffs shall be permitted to file a single consolidated opposition memorandum, not exceeding 30 pages, exclusive of the caption page, tables of contents and authorities. Dated: April 15, 2019. JONES DAY STEPHEN D. HIBBARD JOHN C. TANG s/John C. Tang ______________________________________ JOHN C. TANG 555 California Street 26th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415/875-5809 415/875-5700 (fax) Counsel for Super Micro Defendants Dated: April 15, 2019. PAUL HASTINGS LLP NICOLAS MORGAN D. SCOTT CARLTON s/D. Scott Carlton __________________________________________ D. SCOTT CARLTON 515 South Flower Street 25th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: 213 683-6000 Facsimile: 213 627-0705 Counsel for Defendant Hideshima

I, Daniel J. Pfefferbaum, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE FILING OF CONSOLIDATED MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO MOTIONS TO DISMISS. In compliance with Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that counsel for Super Micro Defendants, John C. Tang and counsel for Defendant Hideshima, D. Scott Carlton, concur in this filing.

DATED: April 15, 2019 s/Daniel J. Pfefferbaum ______________________________ DANIEL J. PFEFFERBAUM

* * *

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer