Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

In re JUUL Labs, Inc. Products Litigation, 3:18-cv-02499-WHO. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20190418b01 Visitors: 3
Filed: Apr. 16, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 16, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-2 WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiffs and Defendant JUUL Labs, Inc., by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their Consolidated Amended Complaint on January 25, 2019 (Dkt. 81); WHEREAS, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss on March 26, 2019; WHEREAS, Defendant also filed a separate Motion to Compel Arbitration on Mar
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-2

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiffs and Defendant JUUL Labs, Inc., by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their Consolidated Amended Complaint on January 25, 2019 (Dkt. 81);

WHEREAS, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss on March 26, 2019;

WHEREAS, Defendant also filed a separate Motion to Compel Arbitration on March 26, 2019;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff's opposition to the Motion to Dismiss is presently due on April 16, 2019, and Defendant's reply due on May 3, 2019, with a hearing set for May 22, 2019;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff's opposition to the Motion to Compel Arbitration is presently due on April 9, 2019, and Defendant's reply due on April 16, 2019, with a hearing set for May 22, 2019;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs' Consolidated Amended Complaint asserts claims on behalf of 48 named individuals, from 22 states and the District of Columbia, who seek to bring this action on a nationwide basis on behalf of all others similarly situated;

WHEREAS, the briefing and hearing schedule was set prior to Defendant's filing of its Motion to Compel Arbitration;

WHEREAS, the parties have conferred and have agreed it would be reasonable to extend the time within which Plaintiffs may respond to the Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Compel Arbitration;

WHEREAS, the proposed stipulated extension would alter the hearing date set by the Court, and thus would require the Court's approval pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2;

NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and agree to the following:

1. Plaintiffs shall file their opposition to the Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Compel Arbitration on or before April 30, 2019; 2. Defendant shall file its reply papers on or before May 23, 2019; 3. The hearing on Defendant's motions shall be set for June 12, 2019.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: April 2, 2019. MIGLIACCIO & RATHOD LLP By: /s/Jason S. Rathod Jason S. Rathod Attorneys for Plaintiffs Dated: April 2, 2019. GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP By: /s/Austin V. Schwing Austin V. Schwing Attorneys for Defendant JUUL LABS, INC.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer