STIPULATION TO CONTINUE FILING DEADLINE ON PLAINTIFF'S SUPPLEMENTAL REPLY BRIEF; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.

Whereas, Plaintiff Sonja K. Rygg's supplemental reply brief in response to the Court's analysis set forth in the order of February 5, 2019 (Dkt No. 55) is due on April 16, 2019. One prior extension has been requested and granted;

Whereas the Parties continue to meet and confer with regard to the questions posed by the Court in its Order Requiring Supplemental Briefing (Dkt. No. 55) — (1) the specific date Rygg's eligibility for benefits ended based on her earnings at RFI Security; and (2) the amount of benefits due for the relevant period;

Whereas, counsel for Plaintiff Sonja K. Rygg has been expecting his first grandchild on or about April 28th. However, the baby is arriving early and now expected this morning;

Now, therefore, the parties stipulate that the briefing schedule on Ms. Rygg's supplemental reply brief in response to the Court's analysis set forth in the order of February 5, 2019 (Dkt No. 55) be extended by one week so that, instead of the brief being due April 16, 2019, it will be due April 23, 2019. The parties further stipulate and agree to provide the Court with a joint stipulation addressing the eligibility and benefit questions posed by the Court (Dkt. No. 55) on or before April 23, 2019.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff and Defendant, by and through their respective attorneys of record, that with the Court's permission the following briefing schedule be adopted as set forth above.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

I, Laurence F. Padway, hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from the other signatory on this document.

[PROPOSED ORDER]

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, it is so ordered. The briefing schedule set forth above is hereby adopted. It is exceedingly unlikely that any further requests for extension will be granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.