Farris v. 3M Company, 3:18-cv-04186-JST. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190419f14
Visitors: 3
Filed: Apr. 17, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 17, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANT GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES Plaintiff Gary Farris and Defendant General Electric Company, through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate that all claims against only General Electric Company may be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A). The parties further stipulate that the parties shall bear their own
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANT GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES Plaintiff Gary Farris and Defendant General Electric Company, through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate that all claims against only General Electric Company may be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A). The parties further stipulate that the parties shall bear their own ..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANT GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.
STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES
Plaintiff Gary Farris and Defendant General Electric Company, through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate that all claims against only General Electric Company may be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A). The parties further stipulate that the parties shall bear their own attorney's fees, expenses and costs.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
