Brown v. Amis, 16-cv-00603-HSG. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190501c39
Visitors: 11
Filed: Apr. 29, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 29, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTION Re: Dkt. No. 72 HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . Good cause being shown, the Court GRANTS Defendants' second request for an extension of time to file their dispositive motion. Dkt. No. 72. The deadline for defendants to file a summary judgment motion is CONTINUED to July 15, 2019. Plaintiff shall file any opposition to defendants' motion within twenty-eight (28) days of the date the motion is filed. Defendants
Summary: ORDER GRANTING SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTION Re: Dkt. No. 72 HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . Good cause being shown, the Court GRANTS Defendants' second request for an extension of time to file their dispositive motion. Dkt. No. 72. The deadline for defendants to file a summary judgment motion is CONTINUED to July 15, 2019. Plaintiff shall file any opposition to defendants' motion within twenty-eight (28) days of the date the motion is filed. Defendants s..
More
ORDER GRANTING SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTION Re: Dkt. No. 72
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., District Judge.
Good cause being shown, the Court GRANTS Defendants' second request for an extension of time to file their dispositive motion. Dkt. No. 72. The deadline for defendants to file a summary judgment motion is CONTINUED to July 15, 2019. Plaintiff shall file any opposition to defendants' motion within twenty-eight (28) days of the date the motion is filed. Defendants shall file a reply within fourteen (14) days of the date the opposition is filed. The motion shall be deemed submitted as of the date the reply brief is due. No hearing will be held on the motion.
This order terminates Dkt. No. 72.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
