Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. v. Dropbox Inc., 4:16-cv-00119-HSG (KAW). (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190502f14
Visitors: 2
Filed: May 01, 2019
Latest Update: May 01, 2019
Summary: ORDER TERMINATING 4/30/19 JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER Re: Dkt. No. 307 KANDIS A. WESTMORE , Magistrate Judge . On April 30, 2019, the parties filed a joint discovery letter regarding whether Synchronoss should be required to produce documents pertaining to its recent settlement with Egnyte, Inc. in a related case. (Joint Letter, Dkt. No. 307 at 1.) Fact discovery closed on September 21, 2018. Id. Accordingly, the joint letter is TERMINATED on the grounds that it is untimely. See Civil L.R.
Summary: ORDER TERMINATING 4/30/19 JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER Re: Dkt. No. 307 KANDIS A. WESTMORE , Magistrate Judge . On April 30, 2019, the parties filed a joint discovery letter regarding whether Synchronoss should be required to produce documents pertaining to its recent settlement with Egnyte, Inc. in a related case. (Joint Letter, Dkt. No. 307 at 1.) Fact discovery closed on September 21, 2018. Id. Accordingly, the joint letter is TERMINATED on the grounds that it is untimely. See Civil L.R. 3..
More
ORDER TERMINATING 4/30/19 JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER
Re: Dkt. No. 307
KANDIS A. WESTMORE, Magistrate Judge.
On April 30, 2019, the parties filed a joint discovery letter regarding whether Synchronoss should be required to produce documents pertaining to its recent settlement with Egnyte, Inc. in a related case. (Joint Letter, Dkt. No. 307 at 1.) Fact discovery closed on September 21, 2018. Id. Accordingly, the joint letter is TERMINATED on the grounds that it is untimely. See Civil L.R. 37-3 (Discovery disputes must be filed within 7 days of the relevant discovery deadline.). The parties are advised that they would need to obtain relief from the fact discovery cut-off from the district court before the undersigned could entertain this dispute.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
