Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Oseguera v. Zhu, 17-cv-03252-PJH (RMI). (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20190502f16 Visitors: 16
Filed: May 01, 2019
Latest Update: May 01, 2019
Summary: ORDER ON DISCOVERY MOTION Re: Dkt. No. 57 ROBERT M. ILLMAN , Magistrate Judge . On April 10, 2019, the undersigned held a hearing on the parties' Discovery Dispute Statement (dkt. 57). For the reasons stated on the record, and after finding that the opt-out Documents signed by current and former employees entitled "NOTICE OF A PAGA LAWSUIT AND NOT TO PARTICIPATE" are not reliable or may be coercive, it is ORDERED that Defendants will provide Plaintiffs' counsel all payroll and timekeeping d
More

ORDER ON DISCOVERY MOTION Re: Dkt. No. 57

On April 10, 2019, the undersigned held a hearing on the parties' Discovery Dispute Statement (dkt. 57). For the reasons stated on the record, and after finding that the opt-out Documents signed by current and former employees entitled "NOTICE OF A PAGA LAWSUIT AND NOT TO PARTICIPATE" are not reliable or may be coercive, it is ORDERED that Defendants will provide Plaintiffs' counsel all payroll and timekeeping documents of those employees who signed an opt-out document provided by Defendants, by June 9, 2019. While social security numbers may be redacted from payroll and timekeeping documents, the names of the employees shall not be redacted. The documents to be produced here are protected under the Protective Order entered in the action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer