DealDash Oyj v. ContextLogic Inc., 18-cv-02353-MMC (JCS). (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190503d32
Visitors: 10
Filed: May 02, 2019
Latest Update: May 02, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL Re: Dkt. No. 117 JOSEPH C. SPERO , Chief Magistrate Judge . Defendant's administrative motion to file under seal dated April 9, 2019 (dkt. 117) is GRANTED for the reasons stated therein and in the declaration of Marcus Peterson. This order is based on the "good cause" standard applicable to confidential discovery documents attached to nondispositive motions only tangentially related to the merits of the case, and should not be taken a
Summary: ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL Re: Dkt. No. 117 JOSEPH C. SPERO , Chief Magistrate Judge . Defendant's administrative motion to file under seal dated April 9, 2019 (dkt. 117) is GRANTED for the reasons stated therein and in the declaration of Marcus Peterson. This order is based on the "good cause" standard applicable to confidential discovery documents attached to nondispositive motions only tangentially related to the merits of the case, and should not be taken as..
More
ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
Re: Dkt. No. 117
JOSEPH C. SPERO, Chief Magistrate Judge.
Defendant's administrative motion to file under seal dated April 9, 2019 (dkt. 117) is GRANTED for the reasons stated therein and in the declaration of Marcus Peterson. This order is based on the "good cause" standard applicable to confidential discovery documents attached to nondispositive motions only tangentially related to the merits of the case, and should not be taken as a conclusion that "compelling reasons" would justify sealing these documents in a different context. See Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1101-02 (9th Cir. 2016).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle