Garcia v. Healy, 16-cv 05871 NC (PR). (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190507827
Visitors: 44
Filed: May 06, 2019
Latest Update: May 06, 2019
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE NATHANAEL M. COUSINS , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Raul F. Garcia and Defendants E. Healy, C. Countess, N. McDowell, and R. Diaz have filed a stipulation dismissing this case with prejudice, with a request that the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement under Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co., 511 U.S. 375 (1994). IT IS ORDERED that this case is dismissed with prejudice, and that the Court retains jurisdict
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE NATHANAEL M. COUSINS , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Raul F. Garcia and Defendants E. Healy, C. Countess, N. McDowell, and R. Diaz have filed a stipulation dismissing this case with prejudice, with a request that the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement under Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co., 511 U.S. 375 (1994). IT IS ORDERED that this case is dismissed with prejudice, and that the Court retains jurisdicti..
More
[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
NATHANAEL M. COUSINS, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Raul F. Garcia and Defendants E. Healy, C. Countess, N. McDowell, and R. Diaz have filed a stipulation dismissing this case with prejudice, with a request that the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement under Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co., 511 U.S. 375 (1994).
IT IS ORDERED that this case is dismissed with prejudice, and that the Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
