Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

McCurdy v. Rivero, 17-01043 BLF (PR). (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20190507830 Visitors: 14
Filed: May 03, 2019
Latest Update: May 03, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION (Docket No. 128) BETH LABSON FREEMAN , District Judge . Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. On January 29, 2019, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (Docket No. 118.) Plaintiff recently filed a letter stating that he has been transferred to another facility due to mental health issues and requesting additional time to file a traverse in another matter pendin
More

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION (Docket No. 128)

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 29, 2019, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (Docket No. 118.) Plaintiff recently filed a letter stating that he has been transferred to another facility due to mental health issues and requesting additional time to file a traverse in another matter pending before this Court. (Docket No. 128.) Although this letter was clearly intended to be filed in Plaintiff's habeas case, the letter was docketed in this matter because Plaintiff makes a clear reference to this action in which his opposition is currently due no later than May 9, 2019. (Docket No. 127.)

In the interest of justice, Plaintiff shall be granted additional time to file an opposition in this matter. Plaintiff shall file an opposition no later than June 10, 2019. Defendants shall file a reply within fourteen (14) days after Plaintiff's opposition is filed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer