Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe, 19-cv-00723-JCS. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190508b60
Visitors: 4
Filed: May 07, 2019
Latest Update: May 07, 2019
Summary: ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Re: Dkt. No. 15 JOSEPH C. SPERO , Chif Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Strike 3 Holdings, LLC ("Strike 3") seeks an extension of time to effectuate service and asks that the case management conference set for May 10, 2019 be "adjourned sine die." See Proposed Order (dkt. 15-1). The Court previously advised counsel for Strike 3 in a different case "that this Court does not as a matter of course vacate case management
Summary: ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Re: Dkt. No. 15 JOSEPH C. SPERO , Chif Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Strike 3 Holdings, LLC ("Strike 3") seeks an extension of time to effectuate service and asks that the case management conference set for May 10, 2019 be "adjourned sine die." See Proposed Order (dkt. 15-1). The Court previously advised counsel for Strike 3 in a different case "that this Court does not as a matter of course vacate case management c..
More
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
Re: Dkt. No. 15
JOSEPH C. SPERO, Chif Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Strike 3 Holdings, LLC ("Strike 3") seeks an extension of time to effectuate service and asks that the case management conference set for May 10, 2019 be "adjourned sine die." See Proposed Order (dkt. 15-1). The Court previously advised counsel for Strike 3 in a different case "that this Court does not as a matter of course vacate case management conferences `sine die' when no other date to appear is on calendar," and that "[a]pplications and proposed orders seeking relief from appearing at case management conferences in this and other cases where a defendant has not yet appeared should propose a date for a continued case management conference to occur after Strike 3 expects that the defendant will have been served and will have responded to the complaint." Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe Subscriber Assigned IP Address 162.203.163.22, No. 18-cv-2014-JCS, ECF Doc. No. 23 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 23, 2019).
Strike 3's present application is DENIED without prejudice to filing a renewed application and proposed order that comply with those instructions.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
