Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Long v. Starbucks Corporation, 18-CV-02171-SI. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20190528644 Visitors: 6
Filed: May 21, 2019
Latest Update: May 21, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; and [PROPOSED] ORDER SUSAN ILLSTON , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action, through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1). ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED.

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; and [PROPOSED] ORDER

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action, through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1).

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer