Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Reiland v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 4:19-cv-01084-HSG.Civ. L.R. 6-1(b) & 7-12. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20190530b57 Visitors: 9
Filed: May 29, 2019
Latest Update: May 29, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.'S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . Per Civil Local Rule 6-1(b) and 7-12, Plaintiffs Harold P. Reiland Jr. and Melinda P. Reiland ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("Defendant") hereby stipulate for an additional extension of time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint. The Complaint was filed on February 11, 2019 in the Superior Court fo
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.'S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT

Per Civil Local Rule 6-1(b) and 7-12, Plaintiffs Harold P. Reiland Jr. and Melinda P. Reiland ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("Defendant") hereby stipulate for an additional extension of time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint.

The Complaint was filed on February 11, 2019 in the Superior Court for Contra Costa County, and served on Defendant on February 11, 2019.

Defendant removed the matter to this court on February 27, 2019.

On March 4, 2019, the Parties stipulated to a 30-day extension for Defendant to file a response to the Complaint from March 7, 2019 to April 8, 2019 [Dkt 7].

On April 5, 2019, the Parties stipulated to an additional 45-day extension for Defendant to file a response to the Complaint from April 8, 2019 to May 23, 2019 [Dkt 14].

Thereafter, Plaintiffs' counsel, Ms. Phair, went on bereavement leave and was unavailable for several weeks. Ms. Phair has now returned from bereavement leave and the parties have resumed discussion to resolve this matter and are hopeful they will reach a resolution shortly.

In order to conserve judicial resources while the Parties continue to discuss resolution of this matter, the Parties hereby stipulate to an additional 45-day extension of Defendant's deadline to respond to the Complaint, from May 23, 2019 to July 8, 2019.

No other deadlines will be impacted by this stipulation.

DATED: May 28, 2019 LAW OFFICES OF JASON ESTAVILLO By: /s/Caitlin M. Phair Jason W. Estavillo Caitlin M. Phair Attorneys for Plaintiffs HAROLD P. REILAND JR. and MELINDA P. REILAND Dated: May 28, 2019 DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP By: /s/Monder Khoury Joseph E. Addiego III Monder Khoury Attorneys for Defendant JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.

FILER'S ATTESTATION

I, Monder Khoury, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Granting Additional Extension of Time for Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. to Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint on behalf of Plaintiffs Harold P. Reiland Jr. and Melinda P. Reiland and Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. In compliance with L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that Plaintiffs' counsel Jason W. Estavillo and Caitlin M. Phair concurs in this filing.

Dated: May 28, 2019 DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP Joseph E. Addiego III Monder Khoury By: /s/Monder Khoury Joseph E. Addiego III Monder Khoury Attorneys for Defendant JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED, that Defendant JPMorgan Chase

Bank, N.A.'s deadline to respond to Plaintiffs Harold P. Reiland Jr. and Melinda P. Reiland's Complaint is extended from May 23, 2019 to July 8, 2019.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer