Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Blachman v. Ford Motor Company, 19-cv-00047-PJH. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20190531997 Visitors: 6
Filed: May 30, 2019
Latest Update: May 30, 2019
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL Re: Dkt. No. 18 PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON , District Judge . The parties hereto, by their counsel, have advised the court that they have agreed to a settlement of this case, that a formal settlement agreement has been finalized and fully executed by the parties, and that the agreement provides that this court will retain jurisdiction over the parties to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed without prejud
More

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Re: Dkt. No. 18

The parties hereto, by their counsel, have advised the court that they have agreed to a settlement of this case, that a formal settlement agreement has been finalized and fully executed by the parties, and that the agreement provides that this court will retain jurisdiction over the parties to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed without prejudice; provided, however that if any party hereto shall certify to this court, within 120 days, with proof of service thereof on the opposing party, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing order shall stand vacated and this case shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial.

If no certification is filed, after passage of 120 days, the dismissal shall be with prejudice. The parties may substitute a dismissal with prejudice at any time during this 120 day period.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer