Alaniz v. Enterline, 18-cv-05788-HSG. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190603686
Visitors: 12
Filed: May 31, 2019
Latest Update: May 31, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT KIRBY'S MOTION TO DISMISS Re: Dkt. No. 19 HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . Good cause being shown, Plaintiff's request for an extension of time to file his opposition to Defendant Kirby's motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Dkt. No. 19. Plaintiff shall file his opposition to the motion to dismiss by July 2, 2019. Defendant Kirby shall file a reply brief no later than 14 days after the date t
Summary: ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT KIRBY'S MOTION TO DISMISS Re: Dkt. No. 19 HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . Good cause being shown, Plaintiff's request for an extension of time to file his opposition to Defendant Kirby's motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Dkt. No. 19. Plaintiff shall file his opposition to the motion to dismiss by July 2, 2019. Defendant Kirby shall file a reply brief no later than 14 days after the date th..
More
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT KIRBY'S MOTION TO DISMISS
Re: Dkt. No. 19
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., District Judge.
Good cause being shown, Plaintiff's request for an extension of time to file his opposition to Defendant Kirby's motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Dkt. No. 19. Plaintiff shall file his opposition to the motion to dismiss by July 2, 2019. Defendant Kirby shall file a reply brief no later than 14 days after the date the opposition is filed. The motion shall be deemed submitted as of the date the reply brief is due. No hearing will be held on the motion.
This order terminates Dkt. No. 19.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
