Finjan, Inc. v. Juniper Network, Inc., 17-cv-05659-WHA (TSH). (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190607e07
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jun. 06, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 06, 2019
Summary: DISCOVERY ORDER Re: Dkt. No. 513 THOMAS S. HIXSON , Magistrate Judge . At ECF No. 513 Juniper moves to seal a deposition transcript on the ground that third party Joe Security designated it as confidential. However, Juniper did not file a proof of service stating that it served the supporting declaration on Joe Security on the same day it was filed, as required by Local Rule 79-5(e). The Court ORDERS Juniper to serve the declaration on Joe Security if it has not done so already and then
Summary: DISCOVERY ORDER Re: Dkt. No. 513 THOMAS S. HIXSON , Magistrate Judge . At ECF No. 513 Juniper moves to seal a deposition transcript on the ground that third party Joe Security designated it as confidential. However, Juniper did not file a proof of service stating that it served the supporting declaration on Joe Security on the same day it was filed, as required by Local Rule 79-5(e). The Court ORDERS Juniper to serve the declaration on Joe Security if it has not done so already and then t..
More
DISCOVERY ORDER
Re: Dkt. No. 513
THOMAS S. HIXSON, Magistrate Judge.
At ECF No. 513 Juniper moves to seal a deposition transcript on the ground that third party Joe Security designated it as confidential. However, Juniper did not file a proof of service stating that it served the supporting declaration on Joe Security on the same day it was filed, as required by Local Rule 79-5(e). The Court ORDERS Juniper to serve the declaration on Joe Security if it has not done so already and then to file a proof of service.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
