MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge.
Class Representatives' Motion for Preliminary Approval of a Class Action Settlement and Proposed Settlement Class (the "Motion") and the Parties' Joint Motion for Vacatur ("Joint Motion") were heard on May 31, 2019. In connection with the Motion and Joint Motion, the Court has considered the proposed class action Settlement Agreement (attached as Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Jeffrey Krinsk), the submissions of counsel, and all other papers filed in this action. This Order incorporates by reference the definitions in the Settlement Agreement (the "AGREEMENT"). The matter having been submitted, and good cause appearing,
1. The provisions of the AGREEMENT are hereby preliminarily approved. The COURT finds that the SETTLEMENT appears to be fair, adequate, and reasonable to the CLASS MEMBERS, free of collusion or indicia of unfairness, and within the range of likely judicial approval. The COURT also finds that the SETTLEMENT resulted from arm's-length negotiations and is sufficient to warrant the dissemination of CLASS NOTICE to the CLASS MEMBERS.
2. Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23(a) and 23(b)(3), and for purposes of, and solely in connection with, the SETTLEMENT, the COURT finds that each of the requirements for certification of the CLASS set forth in the CLASS REPRESENTATIVES' Motion for Preliminary Approval are met and hereby conditionally certifies the CLASS comprised of:
3. The COURT, for SETTLEMENT purposes only, finds that certification of the CLASS satisfies the requirements under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23(a) and 23(b)(3). In support of this ruling, the COURT conditionally and preliminarily finds that: (a) the CLASS is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable; (b) there are questions of law and fact common to the CLASS; (c) the named CLASS REPRESENTATIVES' claims are typical of the claims of the CLASS; (d) the named CLASS REPRESENTATIVES and CLASS COUNSEL identified below are able to adequately represent the CLASS; and (e) class-wide treatment of the disputes raised in this ACTION is superior to other available methods for adjudicating the controversy.
4. If the AGREEMENT is terminated or not consummated pursuant to the AGREEMENT's terms, conditional certification of the CLASS shall be void. In that event, the CLASS REPRESENTATIVES, the CLASS MEMBERS, and MEF shall be returned to their respective statuses as of the date immediately prior to the execution of the AGREEMENT and neither the AGREEMENT nor this PRELIMINARY APPROVAL ORDER shall have any bearing on, and neither shall be admissible in connection with, (a) any issue in this ACTION or any claim raised under any other state or federal law that was intended to be encompassed within the ACTION; (b) whether certification or decertification would be appropriate in a non-settlement context; (c) MEF's liability for any final judgment or to any CLASS MEMBER; and (d) any judgment ultimately sought to be entered against MEF or otherwise.
5. The COURT appoints and designates Baerbel McKinney-Drobnis, Camille Berlese, and Joseph Piccola as CLASS REPRESENTATIVES for the CLASS.
6. The COURT appoints and designates Finkelstein & Krinsk LLP as CLASS COUNSEL for the CLASS. CLASS COUNSEL is located at the following address:
7. The COURT approves, as to form and content, the proposed CLASS NOTICE, attached to the Supplemental Proposed Class Notice, filed June 5, 2019, including the procedure for the CLASS MEMBERS to object to or request exclusion from the SETTLEMENT, to submit a VOUCHER REQUEST, and to file a Notice of Intent to Appear at the FINAL APPROVAL HEARING and, accordingly, directs that CLASS NOTICE be given in the form and manner consistent therewith and this PRELIMINARY APPROVAL ORDER.
8. The COURT finds that the CLASS NOTICE is the best means practicable of providing notice under the circumstances and when completed shall constitute due and sufficient notice of the ACTION, the SETTLEMENT, and the FINAL APPROVAL HEARING to all persons affected by and/or authorized to participate in the SETTLEMENT in full compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23(c) and (e) and the requirements of due process.
9. The provisions of the AGREEMENT relating to the CLASS NOTICE, exclusion from the SETTLEMENT, objection to the SETTLEMENT, a VOUCHER REQUEST, Notice of Intent to Appear at the FINAL APPROVAL HEARING, and the FINAL APPROVAL HEARING are deemed incorporated as if expressly set forth in this PRELIMINARY APPROVAL ORDER and have the full force and effect of an Order of this COURT.
10. As of the date of this PRELIMINARY APPROVAL ORDER, all CLASS MEMBERS who do not exclude themselves from the SETTLEMENT pursuant to the CLASS NOTICE and the AGREEMENT shall be bound by the new membership agreement attached as Exhibit 5 to the AGREEMENT, regardless of whether the SETTLEMENT is finally approved. This new membership agreement expressly entitles any Massage Envy Spa who uses this or a similar membership agreement to increase the member's stated monthly membership fee following the initial membership term only by providing at least forty-five (45) days' advance written notice to the member's email address on record with the member's Massage Envy Spa and that such notice shall be effective on the date sent.
11. The COURT appoints and designates Hilsoft Notifications as the SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATOR.
12. The COURT hereby directs the SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATOR to provide the approved CLASS NOTICE to the CLASS in accordance with the schedule below and using the procedures set forth in the AGREEMENT.
13. The SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATOR shall be responsible for
14. In accordance with the schedule set forth below, the SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATOR is directed to establish a website at www.massagefeesettlement.com (the "SETTLEMENT WEBSITE") to provide information regarding the SETTLEMENT including requesting exclusion from or objecting to the SETTLEMENT, submitting a VOUCHER REQUEST consistent with the AGREEMENT, the date of the FINAL APPROVAL HEARING, and other information related to the SETTLEMENT.
15. MEF shall pay the SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATOR's reasonable costs associated with the administration of the SETTLEMENT, distribution of CLASS NOTICE pursuant to the AGREEMENT, and any other tasks assigned to the SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATOR by the AGREEMENT, by MEF's and the CLASS REPRESENTATIVES' mutual written agreement, or as this COURT may order.
16. Before any VOUCHER may be issued, each CLASS MEMBER must submit a valid VOUCHER REQUEST in accordance with the instructions set forth in the AGREEMENT and CLASS NOTICE.
17. Any CLASS MEMBER may choose to object to the SETTLEMENT by serving on the SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATOR an objection to the SETTLEMENT in accordance with the instructions set forth in the AGREEMENT and CLASS NOTICE. CLASS MEMBERS who fail to serve timely objections upon the SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATOR shall be deemed to have waived any objections and shall forever be foreclosed from making any objection (whether by appeal or otherwise) to the SETTLEMENT.
18. Any CLASS MEMBER may choose to be excluded from the SETTLEMENT as provided in the AGREEMENT and CLASS NOTICE.
19. Any CLASS MEMBER who timely and properly requests to be excluded from the SETTLEMENT will not be bound by the AGREEMENT, will not have any right to object to, appeal from, or comment on the SETTLEMENT, and will not receive any benefits under the SETTLEMENT or be bound by the new MEMBERSHIP AGREEMENT attached as Exhibit 5 to the AGREEMENT.
20. Any request for exclusion must be signed by the requesting CLASS MEMBER and must comply with the requirements set forth in the AGREEMENT and the CLASS NOTICE.
21. CLASS MEMBERS who have not requested exclusion by submitting a valid and timely written request shall be bound by all determinations of the COURT, the AGREEMENT, and any FINAL APPROVAL ORDER and JUDGMENT entered.
22. The COURT orders the following schedule as set forth in the AGREEMENT:
23. A FINAL APPROVAL Hearing shall be held before this COURT on November 1, 2019, at 9:00 a.m., at the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco Courthouse, Courtroom 7 — 19th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102, to determine all necessary matters concerning the AGREEMENT, including whether the proposed SETTLEMENT is fair, adequate, and reasonable, whether this COURT should grant FINAL APPROVAL, whether there should be any FEE AND EXPENSE AWARD and/or INCENTIVE AWARD, and the amounts of any such awards.
24. Any objecting CLASS MEMBER may appear, in person or by counsel, at the FINAL APPROVAL HEARING to show cause why the SETTLEMENT and the AGREEMENT should not be approved as fair, adequate, and reasonable, or to object to any request for a FEE AND EXPENSE AWARD and/or INCENTIVE AWARD. To appear in person or by counsel, the objecting CLASS MEMBER must file with the COURT and serve upon all counsel designated in the CLASS NOTICE, a Notice of Intention to Appear on or before October 18, 2019. The Notice of Intention to Appear must include the required information in accordance with the AGREEMENT, the CLASS NOTICE, and the SETTLEMENT WEBSITE.
25. Any CLASS MEMBER who fails to timely submit a proper Notice of Intention to Appear will not be heard during the FINAL APPROVAL HEARING.
26. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b), the COURT may vacate or revise non-final orders when it is consonant with equity to do so. In re Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Antitrust Litig., No. 14-CV-2058 JST, 2017 WL 2481782, at *5 (N.D. Cal. June 8, 2017) ("Courts in this circuit have frequently vacated non-final orders in furtherance of settlements."). The COURT finds that vacatur of the Order Denying Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings or, Alternatively to Strike Class Allegations; Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses entered on April 5, 2017 [Doc. 49] and the Order Denying Defendant's Motion for Certification of Order for Interlocutory Appeal and Motion to Stay; Vacating Hearing entered on May 17, 2017 [Doc. 68] (collectively, the "MJOP Order") in the ACTION, solely for purposes of approval of this SETTLEMENT, is consonant with equity as vacatur will better serve the CLASS MEMBERS, the CLASS REPRESENTATIVES, the public, and allow the SETTLEMENT to proceed. Accordingly, the MJOP Order is hereby vacated in its entirety subject to the terms of the AGREEMENT.
27. Nothing in this PRELIMINARY APPROVAL ORDER is, or may be construed as, an admission or concession on any point of fact or law by or against the CLASS REPRESENTATIVES or MEF.
28. CLASS COUNSEL, MEF, and the SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATOR are directed to carry out their obligations under the AGREEMENT.