U.S. v. Ekah, CR 18-0573 RS. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190610b40
Visitors: 1
Filed: Jun. 06, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 06, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . Defendant Faijon Maurice Ekah is scheduled to appear before this Court for a status conference on Tuesday, June 11, 2019 at 2:30 p.m. New counsel for the government was recently added to this case and defense counsel is awaiting additional discovery that has been requested. Additionally, defense counsel is going to out of the office on medical leave for approximately one month. Accordingly, the parties re
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . Defendant Faijon Maurice Ekah is scheduled to appear before this Court for a status conference on Tuesday, June 11, 2019 at 2:30 p.m. New counsel for the government was recently added to this case and defense counsel is awaiting additional discovery that has been requested. Additionally, defense counsel is going to out of the office on medical leave for approximately one month. Accordingly, the parties req..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE
RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.
Defendant Faijon Maurice Ekah is scheduled to appear before this Court for a status conference on Tuesday, June 11, 2019 at 2:30 p.m. New counsel for the government was recently added to this case and defense counsel is awaiting additional discovery that has been requested. Additionally, defense counsel is going to out of the office on medical leave for approximately one month. Accordingly, the parties request that the hearing be continued to July 30, 2019 at 2:30 pm.
The parties stipulate there is good cause—taking into account the public interest in the prompt disposition of this case—to exclude the time from June 11 to July 30, 2019 from computation under the Speedy Trial Act, and that failing to exclude that time would unreasonably deny the defendant and his counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation of counsel taking into account the exercise of due diligence, as well as continuity of counsel. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv). The parties further agree that the ends of justice would be served by excluding the time from June 11 to July 30, 2019 from computation under the Speedy Trial Act and that the need for the exclusion outweighs the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.
SO STIPULATED.
Date: June 6, 2019
ALEX G. TSE
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Date: June 6, 2019
JODI LINKER
Attorney for Defendant
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
