STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXCLUDING TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., District Judge.

The parties appeared before the Court for the first status conference in this case on June 10, 2019. At that time, the Court set the matter for a motions or trial setting hearing on July 29, 2019. The government has produced discovery to the defendant, and defense counsel is in the process of reviewing that discovery. The government is also in the process of producing a small amount of additional discovery to the defendant.

For this reason, and those reasons stated on the record in this matter at the status conference held on June 10, 2019, the parties stipulate and agree that the time between June 10, 2019 and July 29, 2019 should be excluded from calculation under the Speedy Trial Act for the effective preparation of counsel and that ends of justice served by any such continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

The undersigned Assistant United States Attorney certifies that counsel for the defendant has approved the filing of this document with her electronic signature.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Based upon the representation of counsel and for good cause shown, the Court finds that failing to exclude the time between June 10, 2019 and July 29, 2019, would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

The Court further finds that the ends of justice served by excluding the time from June 10, 2019, through and including July 29, 2019, from computation under the Speedy Trial Act outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Having made these findings, it is hereby ORDERED that the time from June 10, 2019 through and including July 29, 2019 is excluded from computation under the Speedy Trial Act. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.