Johnson v. Baird Lands, Inc., 18-cv-05365-VKD. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190620957
Visitors: 37
Filed: Jun. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 19, 2019
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI , Magistrate Judge . The parties' deadline to complete mediation in this action was June 7, 2019, and plaintiff Scott Johnson's deadline to file a motion for administrative relief requesting a case management conference was June 14, 2019. Dkt. No. 29; see Dkt. No. 5. Mr. Johnson did not file a motion for administrative relief, nor did he request relief from the June 14 deadline. The Court possesses the inherent p
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI , Magistrate Judge . The parties' deadline to complete mediation in this action was June 7, 2019, and plaintiff Scott Johnson's deadline to file a motion for administrative relief requesting a case management conference was June 14, 2019. Dkt. No. 29; see Dkt. No. 5. Mr. Johnson did not file a motion for administrative relief, nor did he request relief from the June 14 deadline. The Court possesses the inherent po..
More
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI, Magistrate Judge.
The parties' deadline to complete mediation in this action was June 7, 2019, and plaintiff Scott Johnson's deadline to file a motion for administrative relief requesting a case management conference was June 14, 2019. Dkt. No. 29; see Dkt. No. 5. Mr. Johnson did not file a motion for administrative relief, nor did he request relief from the June 14 deadline.
The Court possesses the inherent power to dismiss an action sua sponte "to achieve the orderly and expeditious disposition of cases." Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-33 (1962). Mr. Johnson is directed to file a written response to this order by June 25, 2019 and to appear before the Court on July 2, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 2, Fifth Floor, 280 South First Street, San Jose, California 95113 and show cause why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle