Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Yacoobali v. Berryhill, 4:19-cv-00682 HSG. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20190621975 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jun. 20, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 20, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT AND SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the undersigned attorneys, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff may have an extension of twenty-eight (28) days in which to file Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and supporting memorandum pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-1(e). The motion with supporting memorandum was due on Friday,
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT AND SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the undersigned attorneys, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff may have an extension of twenty-eight (28) days in which to file Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and supporting memorandum pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-1(e). The motion with supporting memorandum was due on Friday, June 21, 2018. It is now due on Friday, July 19, 2019.

Plaintiff's counsel has had an increased administrative hearing schedule as the Commissioner has recently started centralized scheduling in this area. Plaintiff's counsel is also in the process of moving his office. We are therefore making this request for additional time. This is Plaintiff's first request for an extension.

DATED: June 19, 2019 RICHARD ZIEMAN Attorney for Plaintiff DATED: June 29, 2019 MARGARET T. LEHRKIND Specialist Assistant U.S. Attorney

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer