Sylve v. ROIC California LLC, 19-cv-00261-SK. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190711918
Visitors: 11
Filed: Jul. 10, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 10, 2019
Summary: CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL Regarding Docket No. 14 SALLIE KIM , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiffs filed a notice of settlement in which they advised the Court that the above captioned matter has settled and that, as part of the settlement, the parties anticipate filing a stipulation of dismissal within sixty days. In light of the settlement, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice; provided, however that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court within ninety d
Summary: CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL Regarding Docket No. 14 SALLIE KIM , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiffs filed a notice of settlement in which they advised the Court that the above captioned matter has settled and that, as part of the settlement, the parties anticipate filing a stipulation of dismissal within sixty days. In light of the settlement, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice; provided, however that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court within ninety da..
More
CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL
Regarding Docket No. 14
SALLIE KIM, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiffs filed a notice of settlement in which they advised the Court that the above captioned matter has settled and that, as part of the settlement, the parties anticipate filing a stipulation of dismissal within sixty days. In light of the settlement, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice; provided, however that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court within ninety days, with proof of service, that the agreed consideration for settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing order shall stand vacated and this case shall be restored to the calendar and set for trial. If no certification is filed, after passage of ninety days, the dismissal shall be with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
