Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Anning v. Capital One Auto Finance, 19-cv-01686-KAW. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20190711925 Visitors: 13
Filed: Jul. 10, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 10, 2019
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Re: Dkt. No. 22 KANDIS A. WESTMORE , Magistrate Judge . On June 21, 2019, Defendant Capital One Auto Finance filed a motion to dismiss. (Dkt. No. 22.) Per Civil Local Rule 7-3(a), Plaintiff's "opposition must be filed and served not more than 14 days after the motion was filed." Thus, Plaintiff's opposition was due by July 5, 2019. As of the date of this order, Plaintiff has not filed her opposition. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause, by July 18, 2
More

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Re: Dkt. No. 22

On June 21, 2019, Defendant Capital One Auto Finance filed a motion to dismiss. (Dkt. No. 22.) Per Civil Local Rule 7-3(a), Plaintiff's "opposition must be filed and served not more than 14 days after the motion was filed." Thus, Plaintiff's opposition was due by July 5, 2019.

As of the date of this order, Plaintiff has not filed her opposition. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause, by July 18, 2019, why the motion should not be granted by: (1) filing her opposition, and (2) explaining why she did not timely file her opposition. Failure to timely respond may result in the Court granting Defendant's motion to dismiss as unopposed. (See Westmore Standing Ord. ¶ 22 ("The failure of the opposing party to file a memorandum of points and authorities in response to any motion shall constitute consent to the granting of the motion.").)

If Plaintiff files her opposition by July 18, 2019, Defendant may file a reply by July 25, 2019.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer