Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

McCurdy v. Rivero, 17-01043 BLF (PR). (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20190716a28 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jul. 11, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 11, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING FINAL EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION; GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY (Docket Nos. 135, 137) BETH LABSON FREEMAN , District Judge . Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (Docket No. 118.) The Court last granted Plaintiff an extension of time to file an opposition on May 24, 2019, such that Plaintiff's opposition was due no later than June 24, 20
More

ORDER GRANTING FINAL EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION; GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY

(Docket Nos. 135, 137)

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (Docket No. 118.) The Court last granted Plaintiff an extension of time to file an opposition on May 24, 2019, such that Plaintiff's opposition was due no later than June 24, 2019. (Docket No. 134.)

On June 24, 2019, Plaintiff filed another motion for an extension of time for "a day or 2" to access the library to make copies of his opposition. (Docket No. 135.) A few days later, Plaintiff filed his opposition. (Docket No. 136.) Good cause appearing, the motion is GRANTED. Accordingly, Plaintiff's opposition filed on June 28, 2019, is deemed timely filed.

Defendants' motion for an extension of time to file a reply is GRANTED. (Docket No. 137.) Defendants' reply is due no later than August 9, 2019.

This order terminates Docket Nos. 135 and 137.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer