Reed v. Clear Recon Corp., 18-cv-07715-LB. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190719863
Visitors: 18
Filed: Jul. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 18, 2019
Summary: ORDER DISMISSING CASE LAUREL BEELER , Magistrate Judge . On June 24, 2019, after the plaintiff failed to appear at the hearing on the motion to dismiss on March 7, 2019 and the initial case-management conference on June 20, 2019, the court issued an order to show cause why the court should not dismiss the case for the plaintiff's failure to prosecute it, ordered the plaintiff to file a written status report by July 11, 2019, and directed the plaintiff to appear in person at a show-cause hea
Summary: ORDER DISMISSING CASE LAUREL BEELER , Magistrate Judge . On June 24, 2019, after the plaintiff failed to appear at the hearing on the motion to dismiss on March 7, 2019 and the initial case-management conference on June 20, 2019, the court issued an order to show cause why the court should not dismiss the case for the plaintiff's failure to prosecute it, ordered the plaintiff to file a written status report by July 11, 2019, and directed the plaintiff to appear in person at a show-cause hear..
More
ORDER DISMISSING CASE
LAUREL BEELER, Magistrate Judge.
On June 24, 2019, after the plaintiff failed to appear at the hearing on the motion to dismiss on March 7, 2019 and the initial case-management conference on June 20, 2019, the court issued an order to show cause why the court should not dismiss the case for the plaintiff's failure to prosecute it, ordered the plaintiff to file a written status report by July 11, 2019, and directed the plaintiff to appear in person at a show-cause hearing on July 18, 2019 at 11:00 a.m.1 (This order incorporates the earlier order by reference. It is attached to this order.) The plaintiff did not file a written report or appear at the July 18 hearing. As the earlier order shows, the court warned the plaintiff about the consequences of not appearing, including dismissal of his case.2 Defense counsel also said at the June 20 hearing that the plaintiff told him that he was no longer interested in pursuing the case because the loan had been transferred.3 Under the circumstances, the court dismiss the case with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Order — ECF No. 51. Citations refer to material in the Electronic Case File ("ECF"); pinpoint citations are to the ECF-generated page numbers at the top of documents.
2. Id. at 2-4 (setting forth legal standards and consequences).
3. Id. at 3.
Source: Leagle
