Oyj v. ContextLogic Inc., 3:18-cv-02353-MMC. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190729570
Visitors: 13
Filed: Jul. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 26, 2019
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL [FILED IN SUPPORT OF DAUBERT MOTION TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OR TESTIMONY OF JEFFERY STEC] MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . Defendant ContextLogic Inc. d/b/a Wish's ("Wish") Administrative Motion to File Under Seal ("Motion") was brought before this Court. Upon consideration of the Motion and the supporting Declaration of Marcus Peterson, the Court finds there to be good cause and compelling reasons to grant Defen
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL [FILED IN SUPPORT OF DAUBERT MOTION TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OR TESTIMONY OF JEFFERY STEC] MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . Defendant ContextLogic Inc. d/b/a Wish's ("Wish") Administrative Motion to File Under Seal ("Motion") was brought before this Court. Upon consideration of the Motion and the supporting Declaration of Marcus Peterson, the Court finds there to be good cause and compelling reasons to grant Defend..
More
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL
[FILED IN SUPPORT OF DAUBERT MOTION TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OR TESTIMONY OF JEFFERY STEC]
MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge.
Defendant ContextLogic Inc. d/b/a Wish's ("Wish") Administrative Motion to File Under Seal ("Motion") was brought before this Court. Upon consideration of the Motion and the supporting Declaration of Marcus Peterson, the Court finds there to be good cause and compelling reasons to grant Defendant's request to file certain documents under seal.
GOOD CAUSE and compelling reasons having been shown, the Court finds that:
1. The designating parties possess overriding confidentiality interests that overcome the right of public access to the record of the following documents:
Document Portions Sought to be Sealed
Ghajar Decl., Exhibit 2 (Expert Rebuttal Report • Unredacted portions referring to
of Hal Poret) information contained in Exhibit 6
Ghajar Decl., Exhibit 5 (WISH0005237-77) • Entire Document
Ghajar Dec., Exhibit 6 (WISH00045407) • Entire Document
Defendant's Motion Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. • Unredacted portions referring to
702 and Daubert to Exclude Evidence or information contained in Exhibits 5 and
Testimony from Dr. Jeffery Stec 6
2. The proposed sealing is narrowly tailored; and
3. No less restrictive means exist to achieve this overriding interest.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant's Administrative Motion for Leave to File Under Seal is GRANTED.
Source: Leagle
