Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Chang v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 4:19-cv-01973-HSG. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20190730800 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jul. 23, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 23, 2019
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO'S TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO L.R. 6-2; ORDER HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells Fargo") and Plaintiffs Annie Chang, Tiger Chang Investments, LLC, Asians Investing in Real Estate, LLC, Melanie Gonzales, Gary Gonzales, and G&M You-Niques Property LLC (collectively, "Plaintiffs"), and by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1.
More

JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO'S TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO L.R. 6-2; ORDER

Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells Fargo") and Plaintiffs Annie Chang, Tiger Chang Investments, LLC, Asians Investing in Real Estate, LLC, Melanie Gonzales, Gary Gonzales, and G&M You-Niques Property LLC (collectively, "Plaintiffs"), and by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. WHEREAS, on May 8, 2019, an Order was entered approving a schedule that called for Wells Fargo to file its Motion to Dismiss the initial complaint filed in this matter on June 10, 2019, the Plaintiffs to file their Opposition on July 10, 2019, and Wells Fargo to file its Reply on July 25, 2019 (the "Order");

2. WHEREAS, on June 10, 2019, Wells Fargo filed its Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint (Dkt. 37);

3. WHEREAS, on July 3, 2019, the Parties filed a Joint Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond such that Plaintiffs' deadline to file their Opposition would be extended from July 10, 2019 to July 17, 2019 and Wells Fargo's deadline to file its Reply would be extended from July 25, 2019 to August 1, 2019 (Dkt. 44);

4. WHEREAS, on July 6, 2019, the Court ordered Plaintiffs' deadline to file their Opposition be extended from July 10, 2019 to July 17, 2019 and Wells Fargo's deadline to file its Reply be extended from July 25, 2019 to August 1, 2019 (Dkt. 45);

5. WHEREAS, on July 17, 2019, Plaintiffs filed their Opposition to Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint (Dkt. 46);

6. WHEREAS, on July 19, 2019, the Parties met and conferred and stipulated to extend Defendant Wells Fargo Bank N.A.'s deadline to file its Reply from August 1, 2019 to August 8, 2019;

7. WHEREAS, the hearing on Wells Fargo's Motion to Dismiss is now scheduled for October 24, 2019;

8. WHEREAS, extending the foregoing deadline will not impact any other deadlines in this case.

WHEREFORE, the Parties hereby agree that Wells Fargo's deadline to file a Reply in support of its Motion to Dismiss is extended from August 1, 2019 to August 8, 2019.

DATED: July 22, 2019 McGUIREWOODS LLP By: /s/ Carolee A. Hoover Carolee A. Hoover Attorneys for Defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. DATED: July 22, 2019 GOLMAN SCARRLATO & PENNY P.C. By: /s/ Mark S. Goldman Mark S. Goldman Mark S. Goldman (Pro Hac Vice) Paul J. Scarlato (Pro Hac Vice) Attorneys for Plaintiffs 8 Tower Bridge, Suite 1025 161 Washington Street Conshohocken, PA 19428 Telephone (484)342-0700 goldman@lawgsp.com Scalato@lawgsp.com Eve H. Cervantez ALTSHULER BERZON LLP 117 Post Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94108 Tel: (415) 421-7151 Facsimile: (415) 362-8064 Alan L. Rosca (Pro Hac Vice) GOLMAN SCARLATO & PENNEY P.C. 23250 Chagrin Blvd., Suite 100 Beachwood, OH 44122 Telephone: (484)342-0700 rosca@lawgsp.com Jonathan Garner (Pro Hac Vice) Alfred L. Fatale III (Pro Hac Vice) Ross M. Kamhi (Pro Hac Vice) LABATON SUCHAROW LLP 140 Broadway New York, NY 10005 Telephone: (212) 907-0700 Facsimile (212) 818-0477 jgardner@labaton.com afatale@labaton.com rkamhi@labaton.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated.

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

I attest that all signatories listed above, and on whose behalf this Stipulation is submitted, have concurred in and authorized the filing of the Stipulation.

/s/ Carolee A. Hoover Carolee A. Hoover

ORDER

Pursuant to the Joint Stipulation, and good cause appearing, it is so ordered.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer