Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Zomm, LLC v. Apple Inc., 4:18-cv-04969-HSG. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20190731765 Visitors: 2
Filed: Jul. 24, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 24, 2019
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1, 6-2, and 7-12, Plaintiff Zomm LLC ("Zomm") and Defendant Apple Inc. ("Apple"), by and through their undersigned counsel and subject to the Court's approval, hereby request an order extending the time for Apple to respond to Zomm's Second Amended Complaint by twenty-one (21) days to August 21, 2019. WHEREAS, Zomm filed
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1, 6-2, and 7-12, Plaintiff Zomm LLC ("Zomm") and Defendant Apple Inc. ("Apple"), by and through their undersigned counsel and subject to the Court's approval, hereby request an order extending the time for Apple to respond to Zomm's Second Amended Complaint by twenty-one (21) days to August 21, 2019.

WHEREAS, Zomm filed a Second Amended Complaint on July 17, 2019 (Dkt. No. 84);

WHEREAS, Apple's response to Zomm's Second Amended Complaint is currently due on or before July 31, 2019;

WHEREAS, to accommodate both parties' counsels' pre-planned summer vacation and work schedules, the parties agreed to extend, subject to the Court's approval, the time for Apple to file its response to Zomm's Second Amended Complaint by twenty-one (21) days, until August 21, 2019;

WHEREAS, the modification requested herein will not alter the date of any other event or any deadline already fixed by Court order; and

WHEREAS, this is the first request the parties have made for an extension of time for Apple to respond to the Second Amended Complaint.

It is hereby STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties, subject to the approval of the Court, as follows:

1. Apple will file a response to Zomm's Second Amended Complaint no later than August 21, 2019.

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2(a), this stipulation is supported by the concurrently filed Declaration of Luann L. Simmons.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: July 23, 2019 KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP By: /s/ Michael J. Zinna Michael J. Zinna Attorneys for Plaintiff ZOMM, INC. Dated: July 23, 2019 O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP By: /s/ Luann L. Simmons Luann L. Simmons Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC.

FILER'S ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that the other signatory listed, on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concurs in the filing's content and has authorized the filing.

Dated: July 23, 2019 O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP By: /s/ Luann L. Simmons Luann L. Simmons Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer