Miller v. Peter Thomas Roth, LLC, C 19-00698 WHA. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190731a72
Visitors: 14
Filed: Jul. 30, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 30, 2019
Summary: ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS' DISCOVERY DISPUTE LETTER WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . The Court has reviewed plaintiffs' discovery dispute letter and defendants' response thereto (Dkt. Nos. 55, 56). Plaintiffs' motion is DENIED without prejudice to a fresh motion after plaintiffs' counsel has reviewed the material produced on July 26 and the material to be produced on August 9. Defendants' request for attorney's fees incurred in responding to the instant letter is DENIED without prejudice. The
Summary: ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS' DISCOVERY DISPUTE LETTER WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . The Court has reviewed plaintiffs' discovery dispute letter and defendants' response thereto (Dkt. Nos. 55, 56). Plaintiffs' motion is DENIED without prejudice to a fresh motion after plaintiffs' counsel has reviewed the material produced on July 26 and the material to be produced on August 9. Defendants' request for attorney's fees incurred in responding to the instant letter is DENIED without prejudice. The ..
More
ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS' DISCOVERY DISPUTE LETTER
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
The Court has reviewed plaintiffs' discovery dispute letter and defendants' response thereto (Dkt. Nos. 55, 56). Plaintiffs' motion is DENIED without prejudice to a fresh motion after plaintiffs' counsel has reviewed the material produced on July 26 and the material to be produced on August 9. Defendants' request for attorney's fees incurred in responding to the instant letter is DENIED without prejudice. The request for attorney's fees will possibly be reconsidered if and when plaintiffs bring a new discovery dispute letter. Counsel shall please try harder to avoid involving the Court in discovery disputes.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
