Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Perez v. Kaiser Foundation HP, Inc., 18-cv-07375-SK. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20190806999 Visitors: 9
Filed: Aug. 05, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 05, 2019
Summary: CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL Regarding Docket No. 32. SALLIE KIM , Magistrate Judge . The parties have advised the Court that they have reached a tentative settlement of this case and expect to file a dismissal with prejudice in the near future. (Dkt. 32.) Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this cause of action is dismissed without prejudice; provided, however that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within sixty days, with proof of service thereof, that the agreed consideratio
More

CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL

Regarding Docket No. 32.

The parties have advised the Court that they have reached a tentative settlement of this case and expect to file a dismissal with prejudice in the near future. (Dkt. 32.) Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this cause of action is dismissed without prejudice; provided, however that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within sixty days, with proof of service thereof, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing order shall stand vacated and this cause shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial. If no certification is filed, after passage of sixty days, the dismissal shall be with prejudice. As stipulated by the parties, the Court will retain jurisdiction to interpret and enforce the settlement agreement.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer