Sanchez v. Wyndham Vacation Ownership, Inc., 4:19-cv-02699-KAW. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190813a42
Visitors: 16
Filed: Aug. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 12, 2019
Summary: ORDER REGARDING PROPOSED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Re: Dkt. No. 18. KANDIS A. WESTMORE , Magistrate Judge . On August 9, 2019, the parties filed a stipulated protective order. They did not, however, indicate whether they were using a model protective order or a modified protective order as required by the Court's Standing Order. ( See Judge Westmore's General Standing Order 11.) Accordingly, the parties are ordered to submit, within 7 days of this order, (a) a declaration stating tha
Summary: ORDER REGARDING PROPOSED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Re: Dkt. No. 18. KANDIS A. WESTMORE , Magistrate Judge . On August 9, 2019, the parties filed a stipulated protective order. They did not, however, indicate whether they were using a model protective order or a modified protective order as required by the Court's Standing Order. ( See Judge Westmore's General Standing Order 11.) Accordingly, the parties are ordered to submit, within 7 days of this order, (a) a declaration stating that..
More
ORDER REGARDING PROPOSED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Re: Dkt. No. 18.
KANDIS A. WESTMORE, Magistrate Judge.
On August 9, 2019, the parties filed a stipulated protective order. They did not, however, indicate whether they were using a model protective order or a modified protective order as required by the Court's Standing Order. (See Judge Westmore's General Standing Order ¶ 11.)
Accordingly, the parties are ordered to submit, within 7 days of this order, (a) a declaration stating that the proposed order is identical to one of the model orders, (b) a declaration explaining each modification to the model order, along with a redline version comparing the proposed protective order with the model order, or (c) a declaration explaining why use of one of the model orders is not practicable.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
