Finjan, Inc. v. Juniper Networks, Inc., C 17-05659 WHA. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190815b03
Visitors: 1
Filed: Aug. 13, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 13, 2019
Summary: JUDGMENT WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . Plaintiff Finjan, Inc. and defendant Juniper Networks, Inc. entered into a joint stipulation of dismissal with prejudice, where the parties agreed to dismiss with prejudice all pending claims and counterclaims in the case, thereby rendering all issues already decided ripe for appeal (Dkt. No. 601). Accordingly, all orders in this case are final and FINAL JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED. The Clerk SHALL CLOSE THE FILE. The Rule 54(d)(2)(B)(i) deadlin
Summary: JUDGMENT WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . Plaintiff Finjan, Inc. and defendant Juniper Networks, Inc. entered into a joint stipulation of dismissal with prejudice, where the parties agreed to dismiss with prejudice all pending claims and counterclaims in the case, thereby rendering all issues already decided ripe for appeal (Dkt. No. 601). Accordingly, all orders in this case are final and FINAL JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED. The Clerk SHALL CLOSE THE FILE. The Rule 54(d)(2)(B)(i) deadline..
More
JUDGMENT
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
Plaintiff Finjan, Inc. and defendant Juniper Networks, Inc. entered into a joint stipulation of dismissal with prejudice, where the parties agreed to dismiss with prejudice all pending claims and counterclaims in the case, thereby rendering all issues already decided ripe for appeal (Dkt. No. 601). Accordingly, all orders in this case are final and FINAL JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED. The Clerk SHALL CLOSE THE FILE.
The Rule 54(d)(2)(B)(i) deadline for filing a motion for attorney's fees and/or nontaxable costs is HELD IN ABEYANCE pending resolution of the parties' appeal on the merits. If no party timely appeals, then the Rule 54(d)(2)(B)(i) deadline shall be fourteen days after the time to appeal expires.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
