Sinohui v. Intuit Inc., 19-cv-02546-CRB. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190816738
Visitors: 6
Filed: Aug. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 12, 2019
Summary: ORDER INSTRUCTING PARTIES TO ADDRESS WHETHER COURT SHOULD ISSUE AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE CHARLES R. BREYER , District Judge . The Court hereby directs all prospective class counsel and Defendants to address at the hearing on August 16, 2019, the question of whether this Court should issue an Order to Show Cause whether the Internal Revenue Service is a required party within the meaning of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19(a)(1). See CP Nat. Corp. v. Bonneville Power Admin. , 928 F.2d 905 ,
Summary: ORDER INSTRUCTING PARTIES TO ADDRESS WHETHER COURT SHOULD ISSUE AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE CHARLES R. BREYER , District Judge . The Court hereby directs all prospective class counsel and Defendants to address at the hearing on August 16, 2019, the question of whether this Court should issue an Order to Show Cause whether the Internal Revenue Service is a required party within the meaning of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19(a)(1). See CP Nat. Corp. v. Bonneville Power Admin. , 928 F.2d 905 , ..
More
ORDER INSTRUCTING PARTIES TO ADDRESS WHETHER COURT SHOULD ISSUE AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge.
The Court hereby directs all prospective class counsel and Defendants to address at the hearing on August 16, 2019, the question of whether this Court should issue an Order to Show Cause whether the Internal Revenue Service is a required party within the meaning of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19(a)(1). See CP Nat. Corp. v. Bonneville Power Admin., 928 F.2d 905, 911 (9th Cir. 1991) ("The absence of `necessary' parties may be raised by reviewing courts sua sponte.").
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
