Turcinovic v. Berryhill, 5:18-cv-07821-SVK. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190816a71
Visitors: 7
Filed: Aug. 15, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 15, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR A FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME AS MODIFIED SUSAN VAN KEULEN , Magistrate Judge . Defendant moves, through her counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from August 19, 2019 to September 3, 2019. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's motion. Defendant respectfully requests this additional time due to a higher than normal workload, including two district co
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR A FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME AS MODIFIED SUSAN VAN KEULEN , Magistrate Judge . Defendant moves, through her counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from August 19, 2019 to September 3, 2019. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's motion. Defendant respectfully requests this additional time due to a higher than normal workload, including two district cou..
More
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR A FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME AS MODIFIED
SUSAN VAN KEULEN, Magistrate Judge.
Defendant moves, through her counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from August 19, 2019 to September 3, 2019. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's motion. Defendant respectfully requests this additional time due to a higher than normal workload, including two district court briefs and one district court hearing also scheduled on August 19, 2019.
With this extension, the Court's scheduling order would be modified as follows:
• Defendant shall file any opposition or countermotion on or before September 3, 2019; and
• Plaintiff may serve and file a reply within fourteen days of service of defendant's opposition or counter-motion (on or before September 17, 2019).
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: August 9, 2019 /s/ Monica P Erales*
(*as authorized via e-mail on 8/14/19)
MONICA PERALES
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated: August 19, 2019.
DAVID L. ANDERSON
United States Attorney
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
By: /s/ Marcelo Illarmo
MARCELO ILLARMO
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
ORDER
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
