Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

ZTE (USA) Inc. v. AGIS Software Development LLC, 4:18-cv-06185-HSG. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20190822b19 Visitors: 9
Filed: Aug. 21, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 21, 2019
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER (DKT. 99) HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b), Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, and the Court's Scheduling Order (Dkt. 99), Plaintiff ZTE (USA) Inc. ("ZTE") and Defendant AGIS Software Development LLC ("AGIS Software") (collectively, the "Parties"), hereby stipulate and agree as follows: WHEREAS, on April 15, 2019,
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER (DKT. 99)

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b), Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, and the Court's Scheduling Order (Dkt. 99), Plaintiff ZTE (USA) Inc. ("ZTE") and Defendant AGIS Software Development LLC ("AGIS Software") (collectively, the "Parties"), hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

WHEREAS, on April 15, 2019, the Court signed and entered an amended Scheduling Order (Dkt. 63), which modified the initial Scheduling Order (Dkt. 25);

WHEREAS, on May 17, 2019, to allow the Parties time to confer regarding the Parties' discovery disputes, the Court granted the Parties' request to extend the deadline for Plaintiff's Invalidity Contentions and Production from May 20, 2019 to June 3, 2019, and extend the Parties' Exchange of Proposed Claim terms from June 3, 2019 to June 10, 2019 (Dkt. 73);

WHEREAS, on June 14, 2019, the Parties met and conferred in Magistrate Judge Spero's courtroom to discuss certain discovery disputes;

WHEREAS, on June 21, 2019, to allow the Parties sufficient time to resolve their discovery disputes as agreed during the June 14, 2019 conference, the Court signed and entered an amended Scheduling Order (Dkt. 92), which modified the previous Scheduling Order (Dkt. 73);

WHEREAS, on August 12, 2019, to allow the Parties additional time to confer regarding the on-going discovery disputes and the Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement; the Court signed and entered an amended Scheduling Order (Dkt. 99), which modified the previous Scheduling Order (Dkt. 92);

WHEREAS, on August 6, 2019, ZTE requested an in-person meeting of lead counsel to discuss certain discovery disputes, pursuant to Magistrate Judge Spero's Standing Order ¶ 15 and Dkt. 81 at 2;

WHEREAS, on August 15, 2019, the Parties met and conferred in-person, pursuant to ZTE's request and Magistrate Judge Spero's Standing Order and Dkt. 81. AGIS Software agreed to produce two deposition transcripts, and the Parties agreed to permit an exchange of amended Preliminary Claim Constructions and Extrinsic Evidence pursuant to Local Patent Rule 4-2 by August 23, 2019.1 The Parties further agreed that AGIS Software would serve amended Infringement Contentions to reflect the Parties' agreements by September 3, 2019, and that ZTE would serve amended Invalidity Contentions within 21 days of receipt of AGIS Software's amended Infringement Contentions, by September 24, 2019.2

WHEREAS, to allow the Parties time to resolve their discovery disputes as agreed during the August 15, 2019 conference, the Parties have agreed that good cause exists to extend the discovery deadlines as described below;3

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff and Defendant, through their respective undersigned counsel, that AGIS Software will serve amended Infringement Contentions by September 3, 2019; ZTE will serve amended Invalidity Contentions by September 24, 2019; the Parties will exchange amended Preliminary Claim Constructions and Extrinsic Evidence by August 23, 2019; and the following upcoming deadlines set forth in Scheduling Order (Dkt. 99) be modified as follows:

Event Previous Deadlines Amended Deadlines Joint Claim Construction and August 21, 2019 September 6, 2019 Prehearing Statement Exchange Expert Declarations August 21, 2019 September 6, 2019 in Support of Claim Construction, if Any Responsive Damages September 13, 2019 September 13, 2019 Contentions (same) Complete Claim Construction September 23, 2019 October 7, 2019 Discovery Submit Opening Claim October 7, 2019 October 21, 2019 Construction Brief Submit Responsive Claim October 21, 2019 November 4, 2019 Construction Brief Submit Reply Claim October 28, 2019 November 11, 2019 Construction Brief Claim Construction Hearing December 4, 2019; 1:00 December 18, 2019; 1:00 p.m. p.m.

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

Respectfully submitted, Dated: August 20, 2019 /s/ Bradford C. Schulz Michael Liu Su (Cal. Bar No. 300590) michael.liu.su@finnegan.com FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 3300 Hillview Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94304 Telephone: (650) 849-6600 Facsimile: (650) 849-6666 Lionel M. Lavenue (pro hac vice) lionel.lavenue@finnegan.com Bradford C. Schulz (pro hac vice) bradford.schulz@finnegan.com FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP Two Freedom Square 11955 Freedom Drive Reston, VA 20190 Telephone: (571) 203-2700 Facsimile: (202) 408-4400 Samhitha M. Medatia (pro hac vice) Samhitha.medatia@finnegan.com FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 271 17th Street, NW Suite 1400 Atlanta, GA 30363 Telephone: (404) 653-6400 Facsimile: (202) 408-4400 Attorneys for Plaintiff ZTE (USA) Inc. Respectfully submitted, Dated: August 20, 2019 /s/ Alessandra C. Messing Peter Lambrianakos (pro hac vice) plambrianakos@brownrudnick.com Vincent J. Rubino, III (pro hac vice) vrubino@brownrudnick.com Alfred R. Fabricant (pro hac vice) afabricant@brownrudnick.com Alessandra C. Messing (pro hac vice) amessing@brownrudnick.com Brown Rudnick LLP 7 Times Square New York, NY 10036 Telephone: (212) 209-4800 Facsimile: (212) 209-4801 Sarah G. Hartman (Cal. Bar No. 281751) shartman@brownrudnick.com Arjun Sivakumar (Cal. Bar No. 297787) asivakumar@brownrudnick.com Brown Rudnick LLP 2211 Michelson Drive, Seventh Floor Irvine, California 92612 Telephone: (949) 752-7100 Facsimile: (949) 252-1514 Attorneys for Defendant AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC

ATTESTATION

I, Bradford C. Schulz, hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other Signatories indicated by a confirmed signature (/s/) within this e-filed document.

/s/ Bradford C. Schulz

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. AGIS Software produced the two deposition transcripts to ZTE on August 16, 2019.
2. The Parties intend to file a Joint Letter to the Court summarizing the agreements made at the conference by August 20, 2019, as required by Magistrate Judge Spero's Order (Dkt. 81).
3. The Parties note that, as Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 41) is still pending, Defendant AGIS Software has not yet filed an answer to Plaintiff ZTE's complaint or alleged infringement against ZTE. The Parties are nonetheless proceeding in order to comply with the deadlines set forth in the Court's scheduling orders.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer