Filed: Aug. 23, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 23, 2019
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL Re: Dkt. Nos. 70, 71 VINCE CHHABRIA , District Judge . WHEREAS, on August 1, 2019, this Court granted Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, but allowed the Plaintiff leave to file a second amended complaint by August 22, 2019 (Dkt. No. 68); and WHEREAS on August 15, 2019, the Plaintiff filed a Notice of Intention Not to File a Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 70). NOW, THEREFORE the Court hereby dismisses this action with prejudice. Each pa
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL Re: Dkt. Nos. 70, 71 VINCE CHHABRIA , District Judge . WHEREAS, on August 1, 2019, this Court granted Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, but allowed the Plaintiff leave to file a second amended complaint by August 22, 2019 (Dkt. No. 68); and WHEREAS on August 15, 2019, the Plaintiff filed a Notice of Intention Not to File a Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 70). NOW, THEREFORE the Court hereby dismisses this action with prejudice. Each par..
More
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Re: Dkt. Nos. 70, 71
VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge.
WHEREAS, on August 1, 2019, this Court granted Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, but allowed the Plaintiff leave to file a second amended complaint by August 22, 2019 (Dkt. No. 68); and
WHEREAS on August 15, 2019, the Plaintiff filed a Notice of Intention Not to File a Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 70).
NOW, THEREFORE the Court hereby dismisses this action with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs, and the Court finds pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(c)(1) that at all times during the course of the litigation, the parties and their respective counsel complied with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
