Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Brooke v. AJU Hotel Silicon Valley LLC, 19-cv-00411-SVK. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20190903c49 Visitors: 8
Filed: Aug. 30, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 30, 2019
Summary: ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RELIEF PURSUANT TO FRCP 56(D) Re: Dkt. No. 37. SUSAN VAN KEULEN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff's motion for relief pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(d) is redundant and as such is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and the briefing schedule and hearing date are VACATED. Plaintiff's motion merely repeats arguments that are already pending before the Court. Defendant's motion to dismiss pursuant to 12(b)(1) and, in the alternative, 12(b)(6) was argued on Au
More

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RELIEF PURSUANT TO FRCP 56(D)

Re: Dkt. No. 37.

Plaintiff's motion for relief pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(d) is redundant and as such is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and the briefing schedule and hearing date are VACATED. Plaintiff's motion merely repeats arguments that are already pending before the Court. Defendant's motion to dismiss pursuant to 12(b)(1) and, in the alternative, 12(b)(6) was argued on August 27, 2019 and has been taken under submission. As discussed at the hearing, the Court will evaluate, among other issues, whether Plaintiff should be allowed to conduct limited discovery and to file a supplemental response to the pending motion. Until the Court issues its order, discovery in this matter is STAYED. See Dkt. 39.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer